Discussion on ‘Teaching disadvantaged children’ always carries the risk of identifying the precise ‘disadvantaged’ of the children. Any such description has to be values loaded and such valorisation cannot be unquestionable. NCTE-NCF document, however qualified the ‘disadvantaged children’ as the socially and economically disadvantaged groups. Vikramshila Education Resource Society, Kolkata engaged in intervening in this issue is with an assumption that values like social or economic status are qualified by the availability of social and economic opportunities where education as a sub-text could be referred as a means through which such social and economic opportunities could be achieved in creating an equitable society and for the development of the society in general. The teacher’s role is critical there. Vikramshila considers teachers as agencies of change in that direction.
Historically, the student population in the schools in this country were mainly of two kinds: # One with money and time to spare and the other who had money but no time to spare. There were a third kind always; those who had no money or time to spare with no actual need for formal education and thrives on common knowledge that divides advantaged children from a disadvantaged. Vikramshila accepts that in removing socio-culturally mediated divide there is need for not only an intervention into the delivery system but also into the content of education through democratization of classrooms experience. Vikramshila’s endeavour is to relate common knowledge in the socio-economic and cultural life of the society into the knowledge system of the school to make education meaningful to the ‘disadvantaged children’. This proposition of democratic access in the education in this context is a modernization agenda that disengages from the accumulated practice of segregation decided by social and economic disparity.
State initiative on free and compulsory education have opened up option to reach out for those who were economically not well off to meet the cost of education. But interestingly, there is not enough data on the extent and degree of such socially-economically disadvantaged children in our schools. And, secondly there is an almost absence of the body of knowledge researched out on the practice of teaching disadvantaged children emerging as a distinct pedagogic discourse. There is no decided policy on how the ‘disadvantage’ shall be addressed: either as homogenous group or recognizing the inherent heterogeneity. This is not an argument in discontent but that is what Vikramshila learned in the process of intervening into the issue of ‘teaching disadvantaged children’. And, that provoked Vikramshila to embark upon Action research to understand the problem as an obvious choice.
Hypothetically creating a simulated classroom situation for the child, stripped off their identities that were forced upon her by the socio-economic realities certainly could be one of the solutions to this problem. Pursuing a knowledge ideal without being prejudiced by one’s personal identity in the society and the associated economic status is after all the basis of democratic learning deconstructing the power discourse in the schoolsphere. But the key question however revolves around the mentor of such classroom. Where preparing teacher is critical for such an idealised classroom as a space where the socio-economic divide caused by realities outside the classroom is consciously suspended.
Vikramshila’s ‘New direction’: Nabadisha: Mr D. K. Bajpayee the then Commissioner of Kolkata police in 1999 was concerned with the slum children mainly of Garden Reach area, ill famed for criminal activity. Police commissioner wished not only to mainstream them but maintain a formal link between the children of the locality with the police. Vikramshila otherwise was engaged with such children in rural Bengal for long, but here it was a new situation and Vikramshila found an option for engaging with the urban disadvantaged children that matched Mr Bajpayee’s concern. The project-Nabadisha i.e., New direction took off in active collaboration with Kolkata police. Local police stations of the area doubled as learning centres for the children. Deep in abject poverty the children there were mainly working in unorganized sector as domestic workers, rag pickers. Children of sex workers and children from religious and cultural minorities were unable to attend school despite having opportunity of access. In spite of the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan (SSA) and special programmes such as Shikshalayas, a significant number of the children remained outside the ambit of education, apparently they didn’t need that and the rest were “dropped out”. Nabadisha began their action research with a hypothesis that the vulnerabilities faced by these children are of a different nature and the government school system have failed to address the problem. The project operated in 24 centres across Kolkata and its outskirts the initial fund was provided by CRY and logistic support was provided by Kolkata police.
Challenges faced by Teachers of Naba Disha
Age-wise or learning skill-wise un-segregable children from reluctant families which has no formal educational background being the major group of the children there, the initial problem confronted was to bring the child to the learning centre for a certain period of time. In general the challenges were related with (a) factors determined by the community’s disinterest with formal and mainstream schooling and (b) there were school related factors which pushed out the children out of the school. The challenges again articulate the life-situation of the children of Nabadisha centres in general and most interestingly the problems identified by Vikramshila are not essentially pedagogic but are socio-economic, that confirms the socio-educational aspect of the problem. The specific challenges the initiative confronted are:
Seasonal migration: Children attending Nabadisha centres were often taken away by their parents to their villages for about one to two months in the school year. This can be attributed to various factors, including search for work and looking after agricultural needs of their community. The absence frustrates their learning process.
Child labour: The children attending Nabadisha centres were often engaged in productive labour to supplement the family’s income. For instance, the child became sole earning member of the family as his father becomes indisposed for several months. Refusing to work is not tolerated and any resistance is physically assaulted.
Problem with the Girl children: Girl children of the centre are expected to do household work and take care of younger siblings. That made it difficult to organize suitable time for them. This is added by the fact that the centre also accommodates the children who are in formal schools, and as such the time schedule has to be beyond formal school hours. There are serious concerns with the adolescent girls. Frequent incident of eve-teasing were a major matter of social tensions. Girls of that age group were keen to get married and elopements are not uncommon.
Community: The parents of Nabadisha children work as semi-skilled labourers such as painters and daily wage earners. Many remain unemployed for long periods of time. Most of the male parents are alcohol or drug addicts. Mistrust, more than ignorance with the formal education has kept the parent community away from formal education. Often argued by the futility or wasting of time in schooling. Marginalised socially the parent’s reasoning finds an argument for economic deprivation. Unable to break the vicious cycle of deprivation falling in the trap of illegality both the parent and their child’s response to education was critical in initiating the programme. Coupled with that, the parents could not be convinced with the play-way mode of school Vikramshila introduced that was soon discarded by them as below the standard. Providing a below the standard education for their child again strengthened their argument for deprivation.
Cultural barrier: School as an institution has its own normative and codes, that are usually a part of the culture of educated families what sustains an organic link between the familysphere and the schoolsphere. Those advents advantaged child to get through in the school culture. But without such cultural memory in the family, uninitiated with such codes and normative not only the ‘un-advataged’ child but her family finds them awkward. Out of this awkwardness the child normally fails to present his preparedness for the school or finds teacher’s commands and language unintelligible for them. There are obvious issues with negotiating with the power discourse dominant in the schoolsphere. This is one of the major causes of these children’s falling behind the expectations of the level in which they are learning. Added to these problems creating democratic ambience in the classroom remained an almost unrealistic proposition for the children whose life experience is more real with harsh and physical violence.
The impact: Before arriving at how these challenges were attended, let me jump to what has been achieved through the years. Incepted in July 1999, the programme is active for more than a decade. The programme today reaches out to 1800+ children and a total number of 3000+ children have been reached out along with their parents in their community. Other than joining mainstream school successfully, the children there are comfortably scoring impressively negotiating with the curriculum requirements. Outside such academic achievements the children regularly participates in:
- Radio journalism interviewing eminent persons as radio journalists.
- Life Skills Orientation Programme
- Functioning as scribe for cerebral palsy child regularly
- National and International Games. Two boys has been selected for playing Rugby and represented West Bengal at the National Level games and one boy has been further selected to play for India in London.
- Writing Skills Workshop
- Traffic Safety Awareness Programme and
- Capacity building of the Community
- Participated in the National Drama School workshop
- Receiving bravery award from the Chief Minister of the state.
- The child who is from red light area finishing her education has joined as teacher there in the centre.
The Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD) and the State Government, today, regard the Naba Disha Project, as a successful urban intervention. Recognizing the efforts of these center, the state government has also begun its mid day meal scheme in these center. SSA West Bengal sends visiting teams from other states to these centres. Recently a team from Andhra Pradesh SSA had come to the centres to see the Urdu pedagogy followed in these centres. IPS trainees periodically visit the centres as a part of their training programme. Police officials from Nepal, Bangladesh police has also visited the centres.
This list of achievements can be recognized as a major success story but Nabadisha broke through a new ground intervening in the community too adding a new direction, or naba-disha which can be enumerated as:
[Impact on the community] The Parents of often-orthodox communities have gradually begun to send their children to the center that expresses their aspiration for economic mobilisation. Their increased interest in the child’s progress is changing the static indifference. This is reflected in their eagerness in putting their children in mainstream schools.
The recent developments with Nabadisha alumnus taking up leadership at community level has created a visible change in the community dynamics; receiving bravery award recommended by the police surely a sign of makeover.
The heterogeneity of the community is more consolidated to take consensus decision in some of the issues related with common good and generating awareness about gender and socio-religious equality. The community a) felicitates mothers whose children have been regular and punctual b) discusses problems with mainstreaming, c) recent issues like epidemic d) the upcoming Matri yojana, e) BPL cards acquisition and eligibility, f) registering for Voter’s ID card,.
Curricular Intervention:
The impact of the programme certainly is a result of appropriate interventions that are more moderation and modulation of the existing curriculum and its delivery, available with contemporary pedagogy. The interventions hardly could be called “innovation” as it is the practice but in most cases apt application excelled as the right solution to the problem. In fact, the other way around identification of the problem is the key to the interventions employed in the programme. For example in order to deal with this issue of multi lingual classrooms the teachers found a solution in improving language coherence in the classroom. The process as a routine engages basics of language competency through listening, speaking, reading and writing but through listening and speaking the children have already acquired a huge source of vocabulary from their homes and peers through their life experience that connects with their community knowledge. The vocabulary stock was utilised by creating of vocabulary dictionaries. Word-lists and vocabulary dictionaries made by the children are used by teachers to introduce them with the idea of the same word in a different language. For instance, ‘safed’ in Hindi, means ‘shaada’ in Bengali. Lists are generated for colours, animals, fruits, birds and other objects or concepts. The dictionary kept on expanding and children learned more and more new words, increasing their verbal repertoire in a particular language, this not only connected the multi-lingual child but the teacher too who was not always comfortable with Hindi or Urdu. This appropriation of pedagogy may not be fresh “innovation” but the key is with the identification of the problem and engaging the right method that is surely imitable. The teachers as partner in the process active in identification of the problem are in an most interesting loop where they identifies not only the problem but the need for their capacity building thus setting the agenda for their training. And, reasonably the solution to the problem opens into newer situation asking for what is more capacity building than what is referred as ‘training’. This continuous negotiation discovers them as an action researcher. Proposing models for Curriculum Management, Stenhouse had conceived an idea of “Teacher as a Researcher”. Nabadisha teachers perhaps present them as an illustration to the theoretically conceived model. Apart from such theoretical implication at the applied level this functional role of Nabadisha teachers actually hold the key to the impact referred.
Nabadisha Action Research:
Put in a text-book example of Action Research, Nabadisha illustrates its early engagement with problematization of the research asking the most innocuous question like-‘Why is it so?’ The teacher as researcher are mostly without pre-service training and when it is there, the standardized version of pedagogic knowledge acquired so did not came to much use. Such skills and knowledge failed come with expected result for the children there had already rejected such expectations. The teacher-researchers were led by senor teachers and that is the Academic Support Group. Consisting of 5 core group members, it is responsible for looking into the day-to-day working of the Centres. They gave both academic and community based support to the teachers in entering the next phase of the research: participant observation’. That is critical for at this stage the capacity of the researcher’s was seriously challenged. It was left for the Academic support group to assess the need for capacity building of the teachers enabling for participation. But a pre-directed measure could not be taken easily for the degree and extent of capacity needed is not clearly known. Leading for a process of inquiry and involving others who could or should be involved in that inquiry, there Vikramshila Project Coordinator and Training Coordinators intervened. The need were analysed and capacity building sessions were organized. Such sessions went across the formal discipline of education. The sessions took them to get support from the Academic Resource Group and for sociological, economic analyses as well linguistic and social-anthropological appreciation of the problem. The sessions of seminars, workshops not only empowered the teachers to develop an appreciation of the reality of the children there but also had them to appreciate the theorizations by the other educator in locating the appropriate decisions. But that again is the phase to construct Hypothesis only. Moving to improved idea in abstraction of the reality always involves a creative ‘moment’ of transformation, an leap from ‘as it is’ to a glimpse of ‘as it could be’. When this refuses existing disadvantage or conditions for disadvantage the possibility of change assumes a political attribute. Such idea as ‘hypothesis’ need to be tested in action otherwise they remain merely ‘interesting ideas’ or ‘just academic’, an impact need to be realised. Participatory action research as an idea does not realise the impact through a predictive cause-effect theory instead suggests possibility and that impact is to be understood to embark upon fresh possibility.
The actions taken accordingly were monitored using a 44-point Quality Mapping Tool. The tool is to capture different features of the project including teacher performance, done on a quarterly basis by the Project Coordinator with support from the Academic Support Group. The monitoring report again is the basis to check the validity of the “hypothesis”. And, analyzing the outcome it puts the programmes in a loop of having another exercise by returning to the ‘problematization’ phase again.
Such description of function and structure may be referred to a system of In-service “training” in conventional vocabulary. May be the logical basis of such a system is continuously upgrading, updating and recharging the knowledge and skills and most importantly recycling of the same. Remarkably here is a system that has evolved that allows not only the teachers to look at the issues afresh, discover solution to the problem but the other functionaries too in looking afresh assessing the need and finding a solution with a sense of problematization capacity. Constant review of the system both vertically and horizontally again is perhaps the key to this programme. But that is precisely how the savage mind learns. Inventing a new sub-continent, Vikramshila had the same challenge taken over her through Action Research.
What I learned and as I understand, Nabadisha opened a different approach to the issue of teaching disadvantaged children which is more a socio-educational and hence political intervention than a pedagogic innovation. Nabadisha is not a school programme so far its structure is concerned. It runs outside the institutional structures of the formal school, for a few hours in the morning before school hours. Located in the police stations the centre at the outset brings the child close to the state power. Removed from the family and the society the centres as a ‘half-house’ opens up a space, which is neutral from the power discourses and the politics of stereotyping there in the family and the society. From such a neutral sphere the child not only gains to question the discourse of power but locates them in a position from where they finds a platform to look for social and economic opportunities. Supported by state power again that option has opened up a new direction for them as we have observed from the observations on the impact. That justifies Vikramshila’s theoretical position. The educational intervention is rather societal for it negotiates with issues that are rooted and manifested the structural attributes of the stratified society. And, it is political for it engages with the status quo in the society, causing thereby a change as we have observed in the impact analysis. The ‘half-house’ could be an ideal for other schools in this stratified society in negotiating with the power imbalance between the taught and un-taught.
In achieving this role of the teacher’s were critical. They for most part of their engagement with the problem, in a problem solving approach have actually gone through a serious Action research, and the periodic re-engagement gave their capacity building exercise an interesting meaning to the term-In-service training! For the teacher of Nabadisha certainly that is a learning situation that not only gave them an option to explore pedagogic knowledge and skills but the process had them reflecting with the social reality of the community. Their continuous interactions with the community in actuality are engagement with the status quo in the society, addressing the causal of the disadvantages of the child. It was an occasion through which the teachers discover her as “agents of change”. Interview with the teachers reveals that the process had educated them and maturing both intellectually and emotionally. As a matter of fact in most case they had turned out to be ‘community leaders’ than just a teacher. What interests much is the fact that even paid with a minimum remuneration the teachers are most happy a person. Other than only less than 5% of them left the job through this period despite the job profile does not provides much comfort and puts them constantly under challenges. If this re-describes the identity of the teacher, the description surely has a signature of modernity. In difference to the standard discourse of In-service teacher’s training where teachers were periodically upgraded with newer knowledge and skills as has been researched out in disconnection with the teachers, Vikramshila discovers a mode of constant negotiation with the problem by the teachers and recharging their capacity with a sense of ‘ownership’. That puts the teachers more as “active” implementers than passive “trainee”. The result such “Teacher driven” actions has brought forwarded may not be replicated by “system driven” as it is referred in the management literatures where the structures involved in Vikramshila experience cannot be ignored.
The NCTE curricular framework in in-service teacher training kept open “routes towards Teachers’ continuous professional development”. Concluding the presentation I wonder if this idea of Action research could be a route through which the programme of In-service training of teachers could be processed. But of course that needs to be articulated through structured investigation of the experience and putting it on anvil.
I acknowledge my thanks to the Project Coordinator and the Nabadisha team of Vikramshila for allowing me a rare peep-view into their activities and also taking part actively responding to my curiosity. I thank the Organizers of this seminar for allowing me to present my experience with Nabadisha. Thank you all !
Presented in the International Seminar on "In-Service Teacher Development" Organized by MHRD, NUPEA, NCTE and Vidya Bhawan Society at Bhubneswar from 21st to 23rd Oct 2010